[TexasARDF] [ARDF] 1:10000 vs. 1:150000
Vadim Afonkin (Comcast)
vadim.afonkin at comcast.net
Mon Jan 28 06:45:26 PST 2008
Most countries use 1:150000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker at kenharker.com>
To: <ardf at kkn.net>; <texasardf at texasardf.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:53 PM
Subject: [ARDF] 1:10000 vs. 1:150000
> The organizing committee for the 2008 USA ARDF Championships is having
> an internal debate about the map scale to use for the competition. We
> would
> like to have the maps fit on an 8.5" x 11" sheet of paper.
>
> 1:15000: Same scale as used in World Championships. We can probably get
> slightly longer courses on the maps, but that might involve slight
> overlap in terrain from day 1 to day 2.
>
> 1:10000: Easier to read, including some terrain detail (principally dry
> ditch markings) that tend to get lost at 1:150000. Courses would
> necessarily be shorter in order to fit entirely on the map - some
> classes would probably have an optimal course length < 6 km.
>
> I would like to get a sense of what everyone would prefer. In 2006
> in North Carolina we used 1:15000. In 2007 in California we used 1:10000.
>
> --
> Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
> kenharker at kenharker.com
> http://www.kenharker.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARDF mailing list
> ARDF at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/ardf
More information about the TexasARDF
mailing list