[Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof

[k6rb at baymoon.com]

<style type="text/css">-></style>


I think before we jump to conclusions, we need to find out more. I
have the list of all those I emailed and can compare it to the list of
those who participated from JA. I could compile a small list of those who
were emailed and did not participate, and then we can find out if there
was some common denominator.
Rob K6RB
 
Apologies to Atsu for the typographical error when I typed his
name.
 

Pete, W1RM

 


From: Peter
Chamalian [mailto:w1rm at arrl.net] 

Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:26 PM

To: 'Alan Maenchen'; cwo at kkn.net

Subject: Re: [Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof


 
Perhaps Atus can suggest wording for the rules to clarify that for
the JA&rsquo;s?
 
Pete, W1RM
 

From: Alan Maenchen
[mailto:ad6e at arrl.net] 

Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:20 PM

To: cwo at kkn.net

Subject: [Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof

 
I got a note from Atsu,
JE1TRV with an interesting thought.

It may be that the JA contesters think that they only get points if they
work NA .. so why bother?

Not sure how that could be misconstrued, but it's one possible explanation
for the lack of activity.

He didn't point to anything specific .. 



73, Alan AD6E



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20120917/1d82375c/attachment.html