[Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof

[Alan Maenchen]

Well, I specifically asked for any advice he could offer, but no response
to that.
Alan




On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Peter Chamalian <w1rm at arrl.net> wrote:

> Apologies to Atsu for the typographical error when I typed his name.****
>
> ** **
>
> Pete, W1RM****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Peter Chamalian [mailto:w1rm at arrl.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 17, 2012 3:26 PM
> *To:* 'Alan Maenchen'; cwo at kkn.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof****
>
> ** **
>
> Perhaps Atus can suggest wording for the rules to clarify that for the
> JA’s?****
>
> ** **
>
> Pete, W1RM****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Alan Maenchen [mailto:ad6e at arrl.net <ad6e at arrl.net>]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2012 11:20 PM
> *To:* cwo at kkn.net
> *Subject:* [Cwo] JA ... or lack thereof****
>
> ** **
>
> I got a note from Atsu, JE1TRV with an interesting thought.
> It may be that the JA contesters think that they only get points if they
> work NA .. so why bother?
> Not sure how that could be misconstrued, but it's one possible explanation
> for the lack of activity.
> He didn't point to anything specific ..
>
> 73, Alan  AD6E****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20120917/7acc3ada/attachment-0001.html