[Cwo] Sample Cabrillo 3.0 File
Peter Chamalian
w1rm at arrl.net
Tue May 31 03:43:47 PDT 2011
That's my error. I put # in the exchange rather than 001 - Here's a revised
output Cabrillo file.
START-OF-LOG: 3.0
LOCATION: CT
CALLSIGN: W1RM
CLUB: Yankee Clipper Contest Club
CONTEST: CWOPS-Open
CATEGORY-OPERATOR: SINGLE-OP
CATEGORY-ASSISTED: ASSISTED
CATEGORY-BAND: ALL
CATEGORY-MODE: CW
CATEGORY-POWER: HIGH
CATEGORY-STATION: FIXED
CATEGORY-TRANSMITTER: ONE
CLAIMED-SCORE: 25
OPERATORS: W1RM
NAME: Peter Chamalian
ADDRESS: 81 Savarese Lane
ADDRESS-CITY: Burlington
ADDRESS-STATE-PROVINCE: CT
ADDRESS-POSTALCODE: 06013
ADDRESS-COUNTRY: USA
CREATED-BY: N1MM Logger V11.5.3
QSO: 21013 CW 2011-05-31 1040 W1RM 1 001 K6RB
1 ROB
QSO: 21013 CW 2011-05-31 1041 W1RM 2 001 AD6E
1 AL
QSO: 21013 CW 2011-05-31 1042 W1RM 3 001 W1XX
1 JOHN
QSO: 21013 CW 2011-05-31 1042 W1RM 4 001 W1ECH
2 GARY
QSO: 21013 CW 2011-05-31 1042 W1RM 5 001 G4BUE
3 CHRIS
END-OF-LOG:
Pete, W1RM
From: Alan Maenchen [mailto:ad6e at arrl.net]
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 1:58 PM
To: Peter Chamalian; cwo at kkn.net
Subject: Re: Sample Cabrillo 3.0 File
Things seem to be happening faster than I can keep up with. Probably a good
thing. :-)
The sample file - here is one QSO:
QSO: 14022 CW 2011-05-29 1924 W1RM 10 # K6RB
0 ROB
Note there is no sent NAME, but there is "#" which is irrelevant, and will
cause trouble in log checking.
The Received serial number is zero. Is this what happens when you forget to
log a number? If so, then it is OK. Other QSOs had a valid serial number
(even some >1000 which is highly unlikely in a 4 hour event).
Everything else seems OK.
73, Alan AD6E
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Peter Chamalian <w1rm at arrl.net> wrote:
Attached is a sample Cabrillo output from the N1MM logger with the CW Open
contest module.
Pete, W1RM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110531/d32fb7d9/attachment.html
More information about the Cwo
mailing list