[Cwo] Update needed

[Jim Talens]

I don't think packet makes much difference in this one, and I would think as
a separate classification it would complicate adjudicadtion.

 

We have an award sponsor, right?   How will that be handled, and with what
fanfare?

 

From: ad6e00 at gmail.com [mailto:ad6e00 at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alan Maenchen
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:14 PM
To: John Miller
Cc: Jim Talens; cwo at kkn.net
Subject: Re: Update needed

 

Thanks John .. and thank you all for the support!
Round one is over .. Rob is already researching logs for Round Two
publicity.

I sent a note to N0AX with the results URL.  Please feel free to forward the
URL to club reflectors or others who you think would like to know:
http://www.cwops.org/cwo2011-final.html

Also, please think about any rule changes you want to propose.
In the results, I asked for opinions about allowing packet again. I've
received only a couple of NOs in soapbox feedback, but we'll see how it goes
over the next month or so.  The vast majority of soapbox feedback had to do
with choosing a better date.  We've done that. 

73, Alan  AD6E





On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, John Miller <webaron at gmail.com> wrote:

Just updated.

73,
John, K6MM


On Dec 1, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Jim Talens wrote:

> We need to update the CWops CWO webpage to show the 2012 dates for CWO....
> http://cwops.org/cwopen.html
>
> If I knew how I would do it myself!
>
> Jim, N3JT
>
>
> PS  My hat is off to Alan, AD6E, who spent untold hours immersed in log
> entries, log checking, etc. to produce a professional set of results for
the
> participants.  Thank you. Alan!
>

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20111201/9f8068f1/attachment.html