[Cwo] Fwd: [NCCC] CWops Open Rules

Tue Aug 16 10:59:03 PDT 2011

For sanity's sake, I suggest that the call used is the one logged both for
individual and team. So, if all the guys at N6RO are using N6RO, that's
fine, but it gets too hair splitting to try and figure out that the
individual log is for K3EST but the team log is N6RO. Or, am I just an old
fuddy-duddy?

Rob K6RB

> We have an interesting rules question. See below.
>
> Can a "contest station" like N6RO be on a team when the operator is
> different for the different sessions? For example;   K3EST at N6RO for
> session
> 1,  K6AW at N6RO for session 2, N6RO at N6RO for session 3
>
> They all use the N6RO call.  They are all S/O in each session.
> N6RO gets the total of all three for their team.
>
> Side question: What happens to the "Combined" score table?  It could still
> be individual scores, does not have to be combined implying M/S. That is;
> K3EST at N6RO has his total score of just session 1, N6RO has his total
> combined score of just session 3.
>
> This does make things a bit more complicated, but its manageable.
>
> Another asside:  I've already told N6WM he can operate from three
> different
> QTHs for the three sessions if he uses his call at all three sites. One of
> them might be N6RO, but if so, that cannot count double in the team
> scoring.
>
> 73, Alan  AD6E
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ken Keeler <kenkeeler at jazznut.com>
> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [NCCC] CWops Open Rules
> To: Andy Faber <andrewfaber at ymail.com>, Chris Tate - N6WM <
> ctate at ewnetinc.com>, Rob <k6rb at baymoon.com>, w0yk at msn.com,
> nccc at contesting.com, AD6E at arrl.net
> Cc: Bob Cox <bobk3est at gmail.com>, Steve Merchant <smerchan at sonic.net>,
> Iain
> MacDonnell - N6ML <ar at dseven.org>, Hank Garretson <w6sx at arrl.net>
>
>
> At 09:39 PM 8/15/2011, Andy Faber wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>  What a great idea! Nothing in the rules obviously would prevent that,
>> and
>> there doesn't seem to be any "public policy" that it would transgress.
>> Let's see what the guru, Rob, has to say, but I'm keen to sign you up
>> for
>> the team!
>>  73, andy ae6y
>>
>
> Let me put my three cents in here:
> I've  been an active in the Wednesday CWTs since the start, and support
> the
> new OPEN contest.
> Unfortunately on weekends, I work, managing an active jazz band, employing
> seven other professional musicians.
> This weekend I cannot operate the first two segments of CWO since I have a
> gig on Saturday, but can do the last segment.
>
> Another slant on team competition, two or three ops from the same station?
>  Looks like Chris wants to do one from N6RO, or all three?- fine with me.
> Maybe we could get K3EST to do the 5-9AM segment, since he will be at RO
> prior to that doing the Lighthouse IOTA thing.
> Or,  Iain or Steve for one of the two first segments.  Or ...........
>
> Since this is a first, why not consider any kind of team competition, with
> different ops at the same station; same op at different
> stations......................**.
>
> I think this CWO is a great drill for SO2R, since at least two bands
> should
> be open in each segment (It works for me in CWT- I've won five of the last
> six at 03Z)
>
> So toss this about and see what falls out!
>
> RO
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------**--------------------
>> From: "Chris Tate - N6WM" <ctate at ewnetinc.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 9:12 PM
>> To: "'Rob'" <k6rb at baymoon.com>; <w0yk at msn.com>; <nccc at contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NCCC] CWops Open Rules
>>
>> > Since this is split up into 3 heats, I was wondering if I could
>> operate
>> > each heat from a different location  e.g.  1 from home, 1 from K6LRG
>> and
>> 1
>> > from N6RO, and still qualify for team competition?
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nccc-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:nccc-bounces@**contesting.com<nccc-bounces at contesting.com>]
>> On
>> > Behalf Of Rob
>> > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 5:51 AM
>> > To: w0yk at msn.com; nccc at contesting.com
>> > Subject: Re: [NCCC] CWops Open Rules
>> >
>> > Ed,
>> >
>> > You have it right. Callsigns are not part of the exchange, but, of
>> course,
>> > it doesn't hurt to confirm that you are exchanging with the right
>> station.
>> >
>> > Rob K6RB
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Ed Muns" <w0yk at msn.com>
>> > To: <nccc at contesting.com>
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 9:48 PM
>> > Subject: [NCCC] CWops Open Rules
>> >
>> >
>> >>I need to understand the rules of this event in order to create the
>> CONFIG
>> >> file for TR-Log.  This is what I think the published rules say:
>> >>
>> >> 1.  There are three distinct time periods in this event, called
>> >> "sessions",
>> >> each requiring a separate Cabrillo log file.  The rules apply to each
>> >> independent session.  There are awards for each session and for the
>> sum
>> >> of
>> >> all three sessions.
>> >>
>> >> 2.  A station may be worked for QSO points on each of six bands in
>> each
>> >> session: 160, 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 meters.  One QSO point is awarded
>> for
>> >> each non-dupe contact per band where the exchange is correctly
>> logged.
>> >>
>> >> 3.  Each unique station is a mult per session (not per band).
>> >>
>> >> 4.  Session score is QSO points x mults.  Event score is sum of
>> session
>> >> scores (three separate logs).
>> >>
>> >> 5.  Exchange is sequential serial number starting with 1 and name.
>> Call
>> >> signs are not required in the QSO, but probably a good idea.  ;>)
>> >>
>> >> Is this what the rules say?
>> >>
>> >> 73,
>> >> Ed - W0YK
>> >> -------------------------
>> >> Ed Muns
>> >> www.w0yk.com
>> >>
>> >> ______________________________**_________________
>> >> NCCC mailing list
>> (http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc>
>> )
>> >> Post to: nccc at contesting.com
>> >> Manage your subscription at:
>> >> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/options/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc>
>> >> Archives at:
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/private/nccc/<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ______________________________**_________________
>> > NCCC mailing list
>> (http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc>
>> )
>> > Post to: nccc at contesting.com
>> > Manage your subscription at:
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/options/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc>
>> > Archives at:
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/private/nccc/<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/>
>> > ______________________________**_________________
>> > NCCC mailing list
>> (http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc>
>> )
>> > Post to: nccc at contesting.com
>> > Manage your subscription at:
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/options/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc>
>> > Archives at:
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/private/nccc/<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> NCCC mailing list
>> (http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/nccc<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc>
>> )
>> Post to: nccc at contesting.com
>> Manage your subscription at: http://lists.contesting.com/**
>> mailman/options/nccc <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc>
>> Archives at:
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/private/nccc/<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>