[FQP] [ARRL-LOTW] Mobiles

[Alan Sewell N5NA]

I never log anyone as /M or /#.  The QSO party software I use when 
operating mobile in a QSO party will allow me to create a Cabrillo log 
for each county I've operated from.  That makes it relatively easy to 
submit my log to LOTW and specify a county location.  The somewhat 
tedious part is creating a location in the TQSL software for each county 
and signing each Cabrillo log with that location.

That being said, what county hunting related awards are available with 
LOTW confirmations?

73,

Alan  N5NA

FireBrick wrote:
> I love to work QSOParties, cw mode.
> But I get almost no LoTW qsl from any Rovers no matter how I enter their 
> calls.
> I wish they would all submit as /M which would help a lot.
>
> But they would still have to separate their logs by county and submit each 
> separately and changing the county for each log section.
>
> Very few Rovers do that....I almost decided not to work Rovers at all.
>
> The idea is to work counties, but the Rovers rarely ever give me a 
> confirmation.
>
> I would love to see the State Party sponsors require proper LoTW submission 
> as a requirement. Or maybe offer extra points for submitting?
>
> What do you QSOP guys think?
>
>
> On 4/26/2010 7:04:24 PM, Peter Laws (plaws0 at gmail.com) wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 19:00, Richard DiDonna <nn3w at cox.net [link:
>> mailto:nn3w at cox.net]> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Is there a consensus as to if one should add the /information when
>>>       
>> loading a log to LoTW???
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> FQP mailing list
> Send mail to - FQP at kkn.net
> Change/edit subscription info - http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/fqp
> FQP Web site - www.floridaqsoparty.org
> Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/y4azlqf
>
>