[FQP] FQP Mobile Rules Clarification

[K1to at aol.com]

In a message dated 3/30/07 7:40:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, k8bb at comcast.net 
writes:


> Not to be a rule creep, but a dipole in a tree or a tribander on a mast are 
> 
> not "capable of motion." The Ohio QSO Party makes a separate "rover" 
> category for such operations, and it has attracted good participation in the 
> 
> past. My suggestion would be to eliminate the "capable of motion" part and 
> lump mobiles and rovers together (not my preference) or make a separate 
> rover category for operations like the ones you describe (my preference).
> 
> All of this is with the understanding that the Florida QSO Party has more 
> categories already than some other QSO parties have participants!!
> 
> Also, fantastic write-up and stats ... you guys do great work!
> 

Appreciate the kind feedback, Don!  

Can anyone quote the rules from the OH QP?  

Also, same question stands from my prior post - How do we handle rovers that 
also operate mobile in between?  

TU & 73, Dan


**************************************
 See what's free at 
http://www.aol.com.