[Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question

[Peter Chamalian W1RM]

Works for me.  Or, for each session, the multiplier is the total number  of
unique calls worked.

 

 

Pete, W1RM

 

From: cwo-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:cwo-bounces at kkn.net] On Behalf Of John
Miller
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 1:32 PM
To: D Faklis <dfaklis at yahoo.com>; Andy Faber <andrewfaber at ymail.com>
Cc: cwo at kkn.net
Subject: Re: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question

 

I have made the suggested change to the rules on the website:

 

http://cwops.org/cwopen.html

 

To Andy (AE6Y):  Thanks for the suggestion.

 

73,

John, K6MM

 

 

 

On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:03 AM, D Faklis via Cwo wrote:





All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed properly?
Please let me know and I'll try to fix.  Thanks!

 

Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y.  Should we modify the rules? 

 

Another way is:    "For each session, each different call sign is a
multiplier the first time it is worked."

 

 

 

Hi Dean,


.......

 

Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded.  It says:
"For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time
it is worked on any band"  It would be clearer to say, e.g.:  " For each
session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is
worked in that session."

 

73, andy ae6y

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Cwo mailing list
Cwo at kkn.net <mailto:Cwo at kkn.net> 
http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150903/7c82d13e/attachment.html