[Cwo] Public Logs and LCRs

[Alan Maenchen]

I'm back ...

I don't object to public logs and/or LCRs.  As Matt noted, very few people
ever ask for their LCR which is a shame since it provides good feedback to
them.  I suspect making it all public won't change that behavior. I think I
got 5 such requests last year.

73, Alan  AD6E




On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:47 PM, D Faklis <dfaklis at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Update:  I received comments from four:  K6RB, W6SX, WX5S, NW2K, all in
> support, if resources permit.
>
> John K6MM, can you tell us if we can do something like CQ WPX on our
> website (for 2014):
>
> Logs:  http://www.cqwpx.com/publiclogs/
> LCRs: http://www.cqwpx.com/lcr/
>
> If so, do we have the resources to do it?  If we are lacking, what is
> needed?
>
> All, any additional comments, please send. Thanks!
>
> 73, Dean, NW2K
>
>
>   *From:* D Faklis <dfaklis at yahoo.com>
> *To:* "cwo at kkn.net" <cwo at kkn.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:57 PM
> *Subject:* Public Logs and LCRs
>   In the spirit of education and continuous improvement, I would like to
> have a discussion on whether or not to make the CWO logs and LCRs public
> (available for download at the CWops website).
>
> As you know, CQ WW, CQ WPX, CQ WW RTTY, and perhaps other serious
> contests, make the logs (and in some cases LCRs) public.
>
> Please comment.  Thank you.
>
> 73, Dean, NW2K
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20131126/d5b30249/attachment.html