[Cwo] Calls worked in CWO

[Marshall "Matt" Thomas, WX5S]

Thought better of the : idea.
this just uses , and then extra calls. I think that looks better
in excel format.

/Matt WX5S


On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Marshall "Matt" Thomas, WX5S <
mmthoma at attglobal.net> wrote:

> Al,
>
> Running your .csv through approximate callsign matcher
> yields the attached csv.  If other approximate matches found,
> see list starts with a ':'. ****BAD CALL for bad calls (like DOUG, etc).
>
> /Matt WX5S
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alan Maenchen <ad6e at arrl.net> wrote:
>
>> Here's a complete list of all calls recorded in all the logs received
>> along with the Name associated with the call.
>> Note, the number next to the call is the number of times that call pops up
>> in the logs. The name may be correct (or not) and the number to the right is
>> the number of times that Name agrees with that call .. all based on received
>> data. So, if the name number is smaller than the call number, one can assume
>> the name was copied wrong somewhere.
>>
>>
>> First, WOW!
>>
>> There are 1149 call signs in this list .. meaning that over 1,000 hams
>> participated in CWO.  Fantastic!   So why did we get only 372 logs? (problem
>> for next time).
>>
>>
>>
>> Second .. there are busted calls in this list.  Here's an example of some
>> obvious ones:
>>
>>   WD5IDT 1 JIM 1  WD5IQT 1 JIM 1  WD5IYT 231 JIM 231  WD5YIT 1 JIM 1
>> Obviously the first, second, and fourth are bad calls.
>> Please go through this list and eyeball others that you think may be bad
>> calls and send me your list.
>> Just because you identify a bad call doesn't mean it is bad. I'll be able
>> to check it. But if you don't give me anything to check, then the truly bad
>> calls will get credit... and we don't want that.
>>
>> Third -  If you see an odd name that you don't think is right, let me
>> know.  That isn't likely, but nothing is perfect... especially me. I'm
>> especially suspicious of JA names.
>>
>> I found only 15 bad logs with format/entry problems. I've sent those back
>> to the owners and asked them to fix their problems. Probably half were early
>> N1MM revision and/or folks using CWT modules.   A bunch more have "Name" as
>> their sent name.  I'm simply fixing those myself with a text editor. All in
>> all, the logs look to be in excellent shape.
>>
>> Tks & 73,  Alan  AD6E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwo mailing list
>> Cwo at kkn.net
>> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110917/653bd5f8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PossibleOtherCalls.csv
Type: text/csv
Size: 25109 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110917/653bd5f8/attachment-0001.bin