[Cwo] a couple more

[Don Greenbaum]

My point was, ding me.  I don't care and for those in it to win it, adjucate away.  In fact, lots of state contests, like the NE QSO party only checks scores who might win something.  That's what all the "check" logs like mine are used for ....

Don
N1DG  dinged........

At 10:46 AM 10/1/2011, k6rb at baymoon.com wrote:
>Wrong! CWO is a CONTEST! CWT is the non-contest. CWO is adjudicated and
>logs are checked. So, if you want to play fast and loose, that's okay, but
>you'll get dinged for it in score. The people who chose to play in CWO,
>for the most part, are serious about it.
>
>Rob K6RB
>
>
>> Definitely I agree with Don. I wasn't careful at all.  It didn't matter.
>> It wasn't a contest.  It was an activity.  So what if I called Pete
>> "Pedro"
>> and recorded it that way?  Or I got the wrong number and didn't bother
>> correcting when I then heard it again?  In fact, I am not sure all this
>> log
>> evaluation is consistent with our "non-contest" theology for CWO.
>>
>> jt
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cwo-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:cwo-bounces at kkn.net] On Behalf Of Don
>> Greenbaum
>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 8:41 AM
>> To: Alan Maenchen; cwo at kkn.net
>> Subject: Re: [Cwo] a couple more
>>
>> I can see how I got 124 vs 134 for W1RM...Pete was esp copy.
>>
>> The other busted number?????   I give up.
>>
>> I was just in it to give points, so I was very lazy on correcting the name
>> filled in by writelog.  I suspect a lot of others felt the same way.
>> makes
>> it harder on you though so I'll be more careful next year.  Sloppy habit
>> holdover from CWT where no one sees the log.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> At 06:14 PM 9/29/2011, Alan Maenchen wrote:
>>>Attached are N1DG and NO5W reports.;
>>>
>>>Here's where being "hard-ass" hits the road.
>>>
>>>SCOT (sent) vs SCOTT (received)
>>>SERGE (sent) vs SERGEI (received)
>>>JULES (sent) vs JULIUS (received)
>>>
>>>
>>>However, I'm accepting ROCK (received) vs ROQ (sent) since the vast
>> majority (149 of 256) copied ROCK from NE7D.
>>>I'm not sure about this one, but I suspect NE7D did indeed send ROCK some
>> times even though ROQ is what's in his Session 1 log as 'sent'. In his
>> Session 2 log, NE7D lists 'ROCK' as his name.  Presumably  >100 people
>> copied "ROQ" scattered over different sessions. I don't have the software
>> to
>> tackle this one, so I'm just going to accept both names.
>>>
>>>Alan
>>>
>>>PS .. I'll be QRT on the internet in another couple of hours.  Back on
>> Monday after CQP
>>>
>>>Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="NO5W.RPT"
>>>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NO5W.RPT"
>>>X-Attachment-Id: f_gt6atfdt0
>>>
>>>Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="N1DG.RPT"
>>>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="N1DG.RPT"
>>>X-Attachment-Id: f_gt6atm9h1
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Cwo mailing list
>>>Cwo at kkn.net
>>>http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>>
>>
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email
>>
>> www.gulftrackservices.com
>> Don Greenbaum
>> 27 Pill Hill Lane, Duxbury, MA 02332
>> phone: 781 934 5534
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwo mailing list
>> Cwo at kkn.net
>> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwo mailing list
>> Cwo at kkn.net
>> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>>
>>



Please consider the environment before printing this email

www.gulftrackservices.com
Don Greenbaum 
27 Pill Hill Lane, Duxbury, MA 02332 
phone: 781 934 5534