[Cwo] CWO and N1MM

[Alan Maenchen]

Rob,

Well, you know more about N1MM than I do.  Last time I used it was 2005.
Yes, other than not getting your name right, it looks OK to me.  Any other
thoughts?

73, Alan  AD6E




On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Rob <k6rb at baymoon.com> wrote:

>
> I don't know that much about N1MM. I downloaded 11.06.01 version and
> selected CWOPEN, had two instances on the screen (e.g .10 m and 40 m), moved
> back and forth between the two, and the numbering stayed consistent. Changed
> bands and the logger followed me, fine. CW sending was good. When I stopped
> at the 9th QSO and asked for the Cabrillo file it said the sent exchange
> would be SENT EXCHANGE. So, the Cabrillo file (attached) has the right info
> for the QSOs, and the right serial numbers for me, but it just says EXCHG
> instead of ROB. Probably something I didn't do on my end. It looks pretty
> good to me.
>
> Rob K6RB
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Peter Chamalian <w1rm at arrl.net>
> *To:* cwo at kkn.net ; 'Alan Maenchen' <ad6e at arrl.net>
> *Cc:* k3ct at verizon.net
> *Sent:* Friday, June 03, 2011 3:03 PM
> *Subject:* [Cwo] CWO and N1MM
>
>  Guys are we ready to have the CW Open module released yet?
>
>
>
> Pete, W1RM
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110604/6e41146f/attachment.html