[Cwo] Log checking/processing

[Rob]

I wouldn't think of changing it. I agree. CWO and CWT are two different events. CWT works, so like they say in Navy, if it ain't broke,....
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Peter Chamalian 
  To: cwo at kkn.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:28 AM
  Subject: Re: [Cwo] Log checking/processing


  Leave CWT alone.  It works, everyone is quite happy with it and we should not tamper with success.  The fact that there is no log checking has not raised any concerns by anyone.

   

  Pete, W1RM

   

  From: Rob [mailto:k6rb at baymoon.com] 
  Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 9:53 PM
  To: Alan Maenchen; cwo at kkn.net; (((WX5S))) Matt Thomas
  Subject: Re: [Cwo] Log checking/processing

   

  Al,

   

  The CWT is a horse of a different breed. In fact, no logs are submitted at all. After the event, you put in your totals on 3830. I have some logs from CWT that I would be happy to give to Matt. CWT is actually unmanaged; the closest to a manager is Art, KZ5D, who coordinates it, sort of. John, K6MM, grabs the numbers from 3830 and posts them to the Website. That's about it. It's really a lot like NS - no formal log submissions, just "claims."

   

  Rob K6RB

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Alan Maenchen 

    To: cwo at kkn.net ; (((WX5S))) Matt Thomas 

    Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 6:23 PM

    Subject: [Cwo] Log checking/processing

     

    I finally talked with Matt, WX5S who is the brains behind the CQP log checking software. 
    I sent him an invite to join this reflector.  He has several suggestions that seem reasonable / interesting.

    He strongly suggested a closer tie between CWO and CWT.  While I've been concentrating only on CWO, his suggestion might make sense in the larger picture. However, I don't want to go stepping on any toes, and I don't know who is managing CWT.  A little help here is appreciated. 

    The main request is to get some sample logs from CWT for Matt to study. This may be easy to do just by going out to some of the entrants and asking for them. This can give him some feel for log quality, and what calls are being worked. CWT is quite different in the sense that it's much more laid back not requiring formal log checking. Would CWT be open to asking for logs? It might provide us with better CWO management tools. While CWT is supported by several modern loggers, I don't think there is any particular Cabrillo format required, so I have no idea what sort of log these loggers produce. It might be a real mixed bag and completely different than what CWO will get.

    73, Alan  AD6E


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    Cwo mailing list
    Cwo at kkn.net
    http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Cwo mailing list
  Cwo at kkn.net
  http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110426/65f8932c/attachment-0001.html