[Cwo] CW open rules rev 5

[Peter Chamalian]

I'm not sure how you can stop the use of Packet/RBN other than through log
analysis and checking which seems to be a huge amount of work.  I would
prefer to have an assisted category.

 

By the same token, my pet peeve is SO2R and SO1R in the same category, but
that's another story.

 

Pete, W1RM

 

From: Alan Maenchen [mailto:ad6e at arrl.net] 
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 9:03 PM
To: cwo at kkn.net; Charles K. Epps
Subject: [Cwo] CW open rules rev 5

 

Please take a look at the attached rules.
I've added an FAQ section and corrected a couple of small issues.
If you can think of other FAQ items to add, please let me know.

1)  I'm still unsure about allowing packet/skimmer.  Please see the note in
FAQ which makes me feel a bit more at ease with this decision. Do you agree?
My thoughts is that any packet use could be identified in the results
somehow .. maybe an asterisk.

2)  I didn't change the log submission text as Don wanted. This is because
we need to identify what we want to do up front (now) and not put this off.
Granted, there is some risk involved but I think it's manageable.

If this is OK, I'm going to send it to the various logger vendors and
request they implement CWO well before Aug. I have not asked N5KO to add
this to the official Cabrillo web page yet. I hope it isn't necessary.

Thanks & 73,  Alan  AD6E



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20110424/ee440df0/attachment.html