[Cwo] CW Open Question

[Alan Maenchen]

Hi Rick,

The CWO sessions are only 4 hours long. That's why we thought that no one
would really try for a M/M or M/S entry. It's a lot different than a 48
hour event or even the 10 hour NAQP.

That said, If you want to try M/M then I have no objection. There's no
category for it but I can flag your log and maybe put a few words in the
writeup about your effort. Let me know how it goes.

However, if you manage to WIN a session award, I could not allow that since
others would complain that it was unfair. But if you do that well it would
be hard NOT to add M/M and M/S next year.

If you actually do M/M please indicate in the SOAPBOX part of your log. I
don't know if the log robot will accept anything but S/O category. I've
never checked that.

73, Alan  AD6E / KH6TU




On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Rick Pendleton <rick.pendleton at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm a member of the K1USN radio club and we made the first ever attempt at
> a multi-multi entry in the 2014 CW Open.  However since this was a hybrid
> entry N1MM didn't allow us to operate in true MM style.  It ended up being
> an "either/or" operation from two stations at the club.
>
> We were thinking of trying again this year but since there isn't a MM
> category in the rules we need some guidance on how we should proceed. Not
> sure if there would be time to get N1MM modified even if a new category was
> added.
>
> As an alternative, we might try doing a team entry from K1USN between me
> (N1DC) and Pi K1RV and possibly others that might join in.
>
> I recognize this is a complicated issue that has "tentacles" impacting the
> rules and all the logging software.
>
> Please send us your thoughts.
>
> 73,
>
> Rick  N1DC
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20160730/3748de13/attachment.html