[Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question

[Charles Sanders]

I agree with your suggested wording. I think the " on any band" in the
existing version adds some ambiguity.

73/Chuck/NO5W

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:03 PM, D Faklis via Cwo <cwo at kkn.net> wrote:

> All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed
> properly?  Please let me know and I'll try to fix.  Thanks!
>
> Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y.  Should we modify the rules?
>
> Another way is:    "For each session, each different call sign is a
> multiplier the first time it is worked."
>
>
>
> Hi Dean,
>
> .......
>
> Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded.  It says:
> "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time
> it is worked on any band"  It would be clearer to say, e.g.:  " For each
> session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is
> worked in that session."
>
> 73, andy ae6y
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150901/53892eca/attachment.html