From dfaklis at yahoo.com Tue Sep 1 10:03:37 2015 From: dfaklis at yahoo.com (D Faklis) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question Message-ID: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed properly?? Please let me know and I'll try to fix.? Thanks! Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y.? Should we modify the rules? Another way is:??? "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked." Hi Dean, ....... Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded.? It says:? "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked on any band"? It would be clearer to say, e.g.:? " For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked in that session." 73, andy ae6y -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150901/8a6c83d6/attachment.html From k6rb at baymoon.com Tue Sep 1 10:19:42 2015 From: k6rb at baymoon.com (k6rb at baymoon.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:19:42 -0700 Subject: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question In-Reply-To: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I agree with Andy's comment. His suggestion is a good one. Rob K6RB > All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed > properly??? Please let me know and I'll try to fix.?? Thanks! > Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y.?? Should we modify the rules? > Another way is:?????? "For each session, each different call sign is a > multiplier the first time it is worked." > > > Hi Dean, > ....... > Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded.?? It > says:?? "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the > first time it is worked on any band"?? It would be clearer to say, e.g.:?? > " For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first > time it is worked in that session." > 73, andy ae6y > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cwo mailing list > Cwo at kkn.net > http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo > From no5w.chuck at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 10:20:20 2015 From: no5w.chuck at gmail.com (Charles Sanders) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question In-Reply-To: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I agree with your suggested wording. I think the " on any band" in the existing version adds some ambiguity. 73/Chuck/NO5W On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:03 PM, D Faklis via Cwo wrote: > All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed > properly? Please let me know and I'll try to fix. Thanks! > > Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y. Should we modify the rules? > > Another way is: "For each session, each different call sign is a > multiplier the first time it is worked." > > > > Hi Dean, > > ....... > > Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded. It says: > "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time > it is worked on any band" It would be clearer to say, e.g.: " For each > session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is > worked in that session." > > 73, andy ae6y > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cwo mailing list > Cwo at kkn.net > http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150901/53892eca/attachment.html From webaron at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 10:31:51 2015 From: webaron at gmail.com (John Miller) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:31:51 -0700 Subject: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question In-Reply-To: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <0CE47EE5-5696-4DE1-9D58-CC9A746172D5@gmail.com> I have made the suggested change to the rules on the website: http://cwops.org/cwopen.html To Andy (AE6Y): Thanks for the suggestion. 73, John, K6MM On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:03 AM, D Faklis via Cwo wrote: > All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed properly? Please let me know and I'll try to fix. Thanks! > > Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y. Should we modify the rules? > > Another way is: "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked." > > > > Hi Dean, > > ....... > > Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded. It says: "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked on any band" It would be clearer to say, e.g.: " For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked in that session." > > 73, andy ae6y > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cwo mailing list > Cwo at kkn.net > http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150901/70b7e03c/attachment.html From w1rm at comcast.net Thu Sep 3 04:16:14 2015 From: w1rm at comcast.net (Peter Chamalian W1RM) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 07:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question In-Reply-To: <0CE47EE5-5696-4DE1-9D58-CC9A746172D5@gmail.com> References: <1828793466.4253588.1441127017367.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <0CE47EE5-5696-4DE1-9D58-CC9A746172D5@gmail.com> Message-ID: <004201d0e639$f266eba0$d734c2e0$@comcast.net> Works for me. Or, for each session, the multiplier is the total number of unique calls worked. Pete, W1RM From: cwo-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:cwo-bounces at kkn.net] On Behalf Of John Miller Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 1:32 PM To: D Faklis ; Andy Faber Cc: cwo at kkn.net Subject: Re: [Cwo] Any Unfinished Biz and a Rules Question I have made the suggested change to the rules on the website: http://cwops.org/cwopen.html To Andy (AE6Y): Thanks for the suggestion. 73, John, K6MM On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:03 AM, D Faklis via Cwo wrote: All, any items regarding 2015 CW Open that are not being addressed properly? Please let me know and I'll try to fix. Thanks! Here is a note from Andy, AE6Y. Should we modify the rules? Another way is: "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked." Hi Dean, ....... Re the rules, I think that the mult rule is ambiguously worded. It says: "For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked on any band" It would be clearer to say, e.g.: " For each session, each different call sign is a multiplier the first time it is worked in that session." 73, andy ae6y _______________________________________________ Cwo mailing list Cwo at kkn.net http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150903/7c82d13e/attachment.html From dfaklis at yahoo.com Sun Sep 6 13:22:51 2015 From: dfaklis at yahoo.com (D Faklis) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 20:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Cwo] 2015 CWO Logs - Update #1 Message-ID: <874944614.2446057.1441570971461.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> So far, we have received ~400 unique logs, within just under 20 hours after the event.? Not bad! Total logs received in?previous years: 2014:? 496 2013:? 847 2012:? 397 2011:? 386 More EU than in 2014.? JA still few and far between. I hope to do a better job at nudging folks for logs this?year. 73, Dean, NW2K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150906/b88d168b/attachment-0001.html From ad6e at arrl.net Sun Sep 6 13:41:30 2015 From: ad6e at arrl.net (Alan Maenchen) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 10:41:30 -1000 Subject: [Cwo] 2015 CWO Logs - Update #1 In-Reply-To: <874944614.2446057.1441570971461.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <874944614.2446057.1441570971461.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Couldn't participate this year ... antenna is on the ground. Dean, pls send me the logs as you get them .. well, maybe daily batches will work better. Then I can get started with the preliminary format editing where needed. Aloha, Alan AD6E / KH6TU On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 10:22 AM, D Faklis via Cwo wrote: > So far, we have received ~400 unique logs, within just under 20 hours > after the event. Not bad! > > > Total logs received in previous years: > > 2014: 496 > > 2013: 847 > > 2012: 397 > > 2011: 386 > > > More EU than in 2014. JA still few and far between. > > > I hope to do a better job at nudging folks for logs this year. > > > 73, Dean, NW2K > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cwo mailing list > Cwo at kkn.net > http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150906/e5ca92ae/attachment.html From dfaklis at yahoo.com Wed Sep 30 04:47:49 2015 From: dfaklis at yahoo.com (D Faklis) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Cwo] 2015 CWO Logs Received Message-ID: <205914524.3311934.1443613669862.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Alan is making great progress scoring the contest and is about 50% complete.? We hope to publish the results in the DEC Solid Copy. Total logs received: 2015:? 671 (S1:215, S2:227, S3:229) 2014:? 496 2013:? 847 2012:? 397 2011:? 386 73, Dean, NW2K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20150930/c13c08da/attachment.html