[Cwo] CW Open 2014

[Alan Maenchen]

Sept 6 sounds like the least problem. Session 3 would butt up against NA
Sprint which is really bad, but it isn't a direct conflict. Could the
session time(s) move to allow some dead time before Sprint starts?

73, Alan  AD6E/KP4  ...  heading for airport.




On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jim Talens <jtalens at verizon.net> wrote:

> August 30 is no good as it does produce a conflict with YO.  That’s really
> a bad date.  So we are back to Sept 6, 20, 27.   Among those what’s the
> field of conflicts?****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cwo-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:cwo-bounces at kkn.net] *On Behalf Of *D
> Faklis
> *Sent:* Monday, September 16, 2013 7:32 AM
> *To:* k6rb at baymoon.com; Alan Maenchen
> *Cc:* cwo at kkn.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Cwo] CW Open 2014****
>
> ** **
>
> I reviewed 23 AUG 2014.  Conflicts are OH and HI QPs, and perhaps KS as
> it's not yet defined on the internet (as Chuck mentioned, W0BH would
> know).  In addition, Tokyo Ham Fair 2014 is a conflict.  ****
>
>  ****
>
> CO QP is not a conflict, perpetual date is "Saturday of Labor Day."  SARL
> HF CW is not a conflict (31 AUG 2014).  We've already determined that YO DX
> is not a conflict.  NAQP SSB is not a conflict (3rd full weekend in AUG).*
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> 73, Dean, NW2K****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* "k6rb at baymoon.com" <k6rb at baymoon.com>
> *To:* Alan Maenchen <ad6e at arrl.net>
> *Cc:* "cwo at kkn.net" <cwo at kkn.net>
> *Sent:* Monday, September 16, 2013 12:36 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Cwo] CW Open 2014****
>
> ** **
>
> BWQP is FOC's twice yearly open event. It goes 24 hours, from 0Z to 2400Z,
> and is international. So, we would face a CW only event whose 24 hours
> overlaps our 12 hours. So, it's not good.****
>
>  ****
>
> We ruled out the August weekends because of a YO-DX conflict and some
> others. We thought we were okay with Sep 13 because we could find no listed
> conflicts, but now learned that FOC had chosen that date back in April, and
> duly notified Bruce Horn.****
>
>  ****
>
> So, we have Sep 20 and Sep 27 as viable alternatives.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Rob K6RB****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> I've been QRT for the past several days.... week.  Been on a boat with
> many $$$ for service so I simply shut down.  Not sure what I've missed.
> catching up on *many* emails.  What is BWQP?
>
>  ****
>
> Generally speaking, any state QP should not be a serious problem conflict
> wise due to their general lack of activity. The exceptions: CQP, PQP, 7QP.
>  ****
>
>
>  ****
>
> 73, Alan  AD6E/KP4
>
>
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Rob K6RB k6rb at baymoon.com> wrote:****
>
> Well... I had a QSO with KZ5D today and he sent me an email sent to Bruce
> Horn and Ward in April selecting Sep 13 2014 for BWQP. We could have
> avoided the current conflict if Bruce had posted it on his calendar.
> But...in any case, Sep 13 will present a conflict during the hours when we
> coincide – so for 12 out of 24 hours.****
>
>  ****
>
> Can we push it to Sep 20. I don’t believe there were serious issues with
> that date either. It’s early enough to where making the change, now, should
> not be disruptive. I sure wish the FOC website’s on-air and calendar
> sections were up to date. We could have avoided this situation had they
> been so. Clearly, the WA7BNM calendar is also not up to date so there’s a
> real possibility of other conflicts arising. Not good.****
>
>  ****
>
> Rob K6RB****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo****
>
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>
> ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20130916/42cccda4/attachment-0001.html