[Cwo] CWO awards
ad6e at arrl.net
Mon Sep 12 22:06:37 PDT 2011
Yes, I did. I agree the awards should be individualized. I think they were
hoping for general purpose awards that could be made up well in advance,
then handed out later after the winner is determined. I made it clear that
is NOT what we want.
He also asked for a date by which we need them. I suggested December, but
I'm uncertain. I just now received the logs from Bruce. The good news is
that I got a great start on the checking software and it seems to be 70%
there. I can dupe check and score successfully. Now working on cross
checking name and NR. BTW, if anyone asks, we received 368 logs for CW
OPEN. Not what I was hoping for, but considering the problems in EU and AS,
it's a good start.
I need help from ALL of you to look at the recorded call list and feed back
to me any dubious calls that may be a bust. It doesn't need to be a proven
bust, just a suspicion. Software will be available to help track them
down... but it can't figure it out by itself.
73, Alan AD6E
PS .. just back from N.C. this evening. Diving was a bust due to high surf
kicked up by hurricane Katia. It's 1am by my eastern time zone internal
clock. I'm QRT.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:34 PM, <k6rb at baymoon.com> wrote:
> I did not follow up with you on the message from the guy from Icom, but I
> don't think the awards should be identical and the differentiator is some
> piece of paper given to the recipient. I think each award should list the
> person's name, call, the session, and the award category (e.g. high power,
> etc.). Did you follow up with him on that? If it's a cost issue, I'm sure
> CWops would make up the difference.
> Rob K6RB
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cwo