[Cwo] CWops Open

[Peter Chamalian]

K3CT is the developer who is supporting both CWT and CWO.  I seem to
remember his comment that the name that appears in the list has a connection
to the name of the event.   I'll ask him about this and see what would be
needed to make the two CWT and CWO unless we want some other name.
CWOPSTEST can be confusing to those who don't know what it is and think it's
just a test thing and not a competition.

 

So what do we want?

 

Pete, W1RM

 

From: Jim Talens [mailto:jtalens at verizon.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 3:23 PM
To: cwo at kkn.net
Subject: Re: [Cwo] CWops Open

 

Or CWT

 

Versus CWO

 

Jim, N3JT

 

From: cwo-bounces at kkn.net [mailto:cwo-bounces at kkn.net] On Behalf Of Hank
Garretson
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 12:20 PM
To: cwo at kkn.net
Subject: [Cwo] CWops Open

 

I may have mentioned this before. Of all the things I've lost, I miss my
mind the most.

There was a lot of confusion and problems with some N1MM users during CWO.
Before the contest, during the contest, and particularly after the contest
in both log-submittal and log-checking arenas. 

A lot of the problems were an inadvertent consequence of how N1MM labeled
the contests in the N1MM Select Contest Type menu.

CWOPS for CWT

CWOPSOPEN for CWO

Hams who selected CWOPS caused problems for themselves, the guys they
worked, and particularly our log checker.

I think it would be helpful if N1MM changed CWOPS to CWOPSTEST. 

I suggest someone in a position of authority make this request to N1MM.

  
73,

Hank, W6SX

Mammoth Lakes, California

Elevation 8083 feet in John Muir's Range of Light

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.kkn.net/pipermail/cwo/attachments/20111111/f71c5510/attachment.html