[Cwo] Log checking/processing

[k6rb at baymoon.com]

Alan,

The reason I sent the adif files is because I never did produce a
Cabrillo, so I'm not sure if the WriteLog module even does so. I'll check
tonight when I get home. If it does, I'll send those files, too.

Rob K6RB

> The purpose of this was to get prepared for CWO and that means Cabrillo.
> Yes, I would be curious if N1MM or Writelog can even produce a Cabrillo
> log
> for CWT.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Peter Chamalian <w1rm at arrl.net> wrote:
>
>> I can provide the same from N1MM logger if that would be useful.
>>
>>
>>
>> But, do you want ADI or Cabrillo files?
>>
>>
>>
>> Pete, W1RM
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rob [mailto:k6rb at baymoon.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:51 AM
>> *To:* Alan Maenchen; cwo at kkn.net; (((WX5S))) Matt Thomas
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Cwo] Log checking/processing
>>
>>
>>
>> Alan/Matt,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have attached a couple of recent CWT adif files based on my WriteLog
>> module. If you want more, I can send more. This will give you an idea of
>> what WriteLog does with the log in creating an adif.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob K6RB
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* Alan Maenchen <ad6e at arrl.net>
>>
>> *To:* cwo at kkn.net ; (((WX5S))) Matt Thomas <mmthoma at attglobal.net>
>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2011 6:23 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* [Cwo] Log checking/processing
>>
>>
>>
>> I finally talked with Matt, WX5S who is the brains behind the CQP log
>> checking software.
>> I sent him an invite to join this reflector.  He has several suggestions
>> that seem reasonable / interesting.
>>
>> He strongly suggested a closer tie between CWO and CWT.  While I've been
>> concentrating only on CWO, his suggestion might make sense in the larger
>> picture. However, I don't want to go stepping on any toes, and I don't
>> know
>> who is managing CWT.  A little help here is appreciated.
>>
>> The main request is to get some sample logs from CWT for Matt to study.
>> This may be easy to do just by going out to some of the entrants and
>> asking
>> for them. This can give him some feel for log quality, and what calls
>> are
>> being worked. CWT is quite different in the sense that it's much more
>> laid
>> back not requiring formal log checking. Would CWT be open to asking for
>> logs? It might provide us with better CWO management tools. While CWT is
>> supported by several modern loggers, I don't think there is any
>> particular
>> Cabrillo format required, so I have no idea what sort of log these
>> loggers
>> produce. It might be a real mixed bag and completely different than what
>> CWO
>> will get.
>>
>> 73, Alan  AD6E
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cwo mailing list
>> Cwo at kkn.net
>> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cwo mailing list
> Cwo at kkn.net
> http://www.kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/cwo
>