[ARDF] Re: Protractors, 80m accuracy
Vadim Afonkin
vadim.afonkin at earthlink.net
Thu Oct 28 20:50:52 CDT 2004
Good physical condition, good orienteering skills will give you 80% of all
you need.
Another 20% will come with combination of speed, right RF equipment and
bearing technique and RF experience itself.
This is why O-runners always good in R-Orienteering.
Cover 1 km for 3:30, don't do stupid things while you on the course and you
all set.
Vadim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Robbins" <cedarcreek at gmail.com>
To: <ardf at kkn.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ARDF] Re: Protractors, 80m accuracy
> Just a clarification. I wrote:
>
> <<One thing I am certain about is the need to more-or-less continuously
> check that the "other" Ts are where they should be based on your
> earlier bearings. Say I'm going to 1 for my first T, and it's a 2km
> leg. For a few seconds each minute, I verify that 2, 3, 4, and 5 are
> where they ought to be. I have found this to be essential to ARDF.
> Sometimes I just check that it's, say, northwest of me, but I check
> it. If I notice anything weird, I take a bearing and plot it.>>
>
> On 2m, if I am in a valley or some other RF hole, I'll still check
> each minute, but I don't consider it weird if there are obvious
> reflections. If I have a bearing from high up, then I get something
> different in a valley, I try to ignore the latter. When I'm in a hole
> on 2m, usually the thing on my mind is to get somewhere useful.
>
> I too, take a lot more than I plot. Say I've got my initial bearings
> down, and now I'm in a position to get some cross bearings. I'll plot
> the first cross bearing as a tick, and then I'll just see where the
> later cross bearings fall with respect to that one. If it's different
> significantly, I put a new tick in.
>
> One thing I think I need to do is to lengthen the cross ticks so it is
> a line extending maybe 500m on either side of the initial bearing. I
> think that will help me to balance the visual sense of the two
> bearings, rather than overemphasizing the initial (meaning more
> distant and probably less accurate) bearing. Right now, when I see
> the little X on the map, it's hard not to just go there. I'm hoping
> the longer lines will help me see the data rather than the "X".
>
> Matthew
> Cincinnati, Ohio USA
> _______________________________________________
> ARDF mailing list
> ARDF at kkn.net
> http://kkn.net/mailman/listinfo/ardf
More information about the ARDF
mailing list